男友太凶猛1v1高h,大地资源在线资源免费观看 ,人妻少妇精品视频二区,极度sm残忍bdsm变态

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Xin Zhiming

For whom does the road toll greedily?

By Xin Zhiming (China Daily) Updated: 2014-12-25 07:48

Officials have justified the continued fees by claiming that investments for the building and operation of those roads have not yet been recovered, so it is reasonable to continue charging drivers.

While at first glance, the Ministry of Transport data seem to justify their stance, a closer look at the data might show otherwise.

For example, in 2013, the managerial costs exceeded that of road operation, which is difficult to understand, and many netizens have questioned whether the road companies are overstaffed and this is a core reason behind the bloated management costs.

The public questioning is not without cause. In a 2008 audit report released by the National Audit Office, it was found that a toll-collection agency in Central China's Hubei province budgeted to have 30 people in the payroll, but it actually employed 144 people. Likewise, a Shanxi road management agency was supposed to have 27 people on the payroll, but it was paying 156 people.

The auditing report also noted that the pay for these road managers was much higher than market levels in some places. Moreover, it said more irregularities, such as the bloating of debts and illegal exemption of toll charges, had been found, which also pushed up expenditures and reduced revenues.

This time, it is not clear yet whether the deficit has been caused by overstaffing, inflated salaries or other irregularities. So the ministry should disclose more detailed information regarding how many road managers it has hired and how much they have been paid, to respect the public's right to know.

Regarding the "other expenditures", the ministry also needs to clarify what these entail, so that the public can scrutinize whether there are any abnormal expenditures.

And even if the balance sheet provided by the ministry turns out to be all above board, the deficit should not be used to justify the prolonged charging of the expressway toll charges.

When a road starts operation with an explicitly set duration for collecting the fees, then it constitutes a de facto contract between the road management authorities and road users. The prolonging of the charges violates this contract and those doing so should be put under strict public scrutiny.

In reality, car users have little say in the decision-making process. This is against the spirit of rule of law and it is high time the transport authorities address the problem and show respect to the public. If they lean toward the commercial interests involved in road management, then it will risk triggering more public anger.

The author is a senior writer with China Daily. xinzhiming@chinadaily.com.cn

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 龙州县| 团风县| 大方县| 华亭县| 东平县| 鄂托克旗| 利川市| 合川市| 策勒县| 锡林郭勒盟| 长子县| 浦江县| 宜城市| 清镇市| 鄯善县| 高邑县| 巨鹿县| 华亭县| 剑河县| 民勤县| 大埔区| 哈巴河县| 泽州县| 绥德县| 从江县| 郓城县| 诸城市| 凤阳县| 建阳市| 虎林市| 赤峰市| 漾濞| 申扎县| 城口县| 淄博市| 萝北县| 正镶白旗| 乌鲁木齐县| 略阳县| 扬州市| 邵阳县|