男友太凶猛1v1高h,大地资源在线资源免费观看 ,人妻少妇精品视频二区,极度sm残忍bdsm变态

  Home>News Center>China
       
 

Shall zoo move? No, say experts
By Wang Zhenghua (China Daily)
Updated: 2004-05-25 08:36

Five well-regarded academicians from Chinese academies of engineering and sciences voiced opposition last week to the idea of relocating the renowned Beijing Zoo from its current thriving site to a location on the city's outskirts.


Six giant pandas are moved from Wolong to Ya'an, Sichuan Province, in this file photo of December 2003. [newsphoto/file]
They said the attraction has been there for nearly a century and it should be better-protected and improved instead of being moved to another place, according to China Youth Daily.

The thought of relocating the venue surfaced in February when Guo Baodong, director of the Party committee's general office of the city's Daxing District, submitted a proposal to the municipal people's congress to move the zoo to his remote district sparking hot debate.

Located between the Second-Ring and Third-Ring roads in the capital's Xicheng District, the Beijing Zoo initially named the Ten Thousand Animal Garden was built in 1908 and is one of the oldest zoological gardens in the country.

It covers an area of around 86 hectares and is home to roughly 6,000 animals within some 500 categories.

In 1972, the Chinese Government presented a pair of giant pandas from the zoo to the United States, leaving behind a fine tale in the two countries' diplomatic relations and making the zoo well-known.

Guo wants to interrupt tradition by moving the site, however, using the argument that animals kept in urban areas may transmit viruses to human beings, so they pose a severe threat to the city's public health.

Hou Baokun, director of the animal preservation department with the Beijing Forestry Bureau, was quoted by the China Central Television as saying that the transmission of SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) and bird flu may still possibly related to animals enclosed in urban areas.

The country was hit hard by the outbreak of SARS which killed 193 people in Beijing last year and the bird flu this year. But the exact causes of those outbreaks aren't really known, other experts say.

One of the academic opponents of the move, Zhang Li a Beijing Normal University's associate professor who is engaged in animal protection, says that creatures in zoological gardens have lived in that environment for years quite happily, so they certainly have not spread diseases to human beings.

"On the contrary," Zhang said, "zoos ought to better protect their animals from throngs of visitors flocking into zoos every day who perhaps carry various viruses that threaten animals."

Zhang also said that many other metropolises in the world, including the Britain's London Zoo, Australia's Sydney zoo, and the top American zoo in San Diego all have their zoos built near their city centres.

Another powerful point raised by Guo and his supporters is regarding animal welfare.

At the moment in Beijing, there are two wildlife garden zoos on the city's outskirts.

According to Xu Yang, head of the Badaling Wildlife Garden in northern Beijing's Yanqing County, animals enjoy more space there.

For instance, animals like bears and tigers are seen running amok in the spacious areas specifically built for them to breed.

At the meantime in the Beijing Zoo, three jackals can only move to and fro in their narrow enclosure to build up their physiques.

So Xu claimed that relocation will enable animals to lead a better life.

But Zhang, while agreeing that some shabby enclosures need face-lifts, insists decision-makers should not merely stress the enlargement of the enclosures at the expense of ignoring individual creature's needs.

The vice-director of the Beijing Zoo was quoted as saying that the improvement of animals' living environments is under way.

The last motivation listed in Guo's proposal states the relocation will help ease the capital's notorious traffic situation.

Located near the Xizhimen area where traffic jams are always seen, the zoo is partially to be blamed for increasing the traffic burden for large numbers of visitors.

According to Hou, the outlet often attracted 200,000 to 300,000 visitors daily.

But others say that expenses will increase four times more than the original fee if the zoo is moved to the city's outskirts.

The five academicians advised the government to be cautious on the issue and solicit more opinions.

 
  Today's Top News     Top China News
 

Chen still a threat to Straits peace

 

   
 

Monopoly law badly needed, report says

 

   
 

Bush vows to demolish Abu Ghraib in Iraq plan

 

   
 

Forced labour case voided in Japan

 

   
 

Oil near record, Saudi hike not enough?

 

   
 

Brazil sees market economy in China

 

   
  Shall zoo move? No, says expert
   
  Beijing man sues Bentley maker
   
  Students challenge unauthorized fees
   
  Service sector vital to macro-economy
   
  Safety drive aimed at curbing inferior food
   
  Tibetan pride high on railway project
   
 
  Go to Another Section  
 
 
  Story Tools  
   
  Related Stories  
   
Zoo animals: ' What's for dinner?'
   
Endangered tiger endangers men
   
A giant panda named Chuan-chuan cools off near a block of ice inside an air-conditioned cage at the Shanghai Zoo July 30.
   
Zoo nurses ill feathered friends back to health
   
World's largest giant panda park opens SW China
   
16 giant pandas born this year
   
Giant pandas move home in Sichuan
  News Talk  
  When will china have direct elections?  
Advertisement
         
主站蜘蛛池模板: 玛多县| 肃北| 阿尔山市| 石泉县| 临夏市| 万年县| 文山县| 林西县| 铅山县| 辽宁省| 宜君县| 靖边县| 镇安县| 玉林市| 中宁县| 云南省| 万源市| 准格尔旗| 繁昌县| 涟水县| 磴口县| 曲阳县| 乌鲁木齐市| 申扎县| 香格里拉县| 尚义县| 蕉岭县| 鲁山县| 宝鸡市| 临安市| 双流县| 吴忠市| 福海县| 十堰市| 九江市| 马鞍山市| 五台县| 青海省| 浦县| 舒城县| 夏河县|